Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nao Hibino vs Mccartney Kessler Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hibino vs Kessler analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Nao Hibino vs Mccartney Kessler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hibino 0 - 0 Kessler
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hibino has won 45.82% of points on their second serve, while Kessler has won 47.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hibino, in recent form, has won 53.59% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kessler has won 57.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.3% and 38.07% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hibino has saved 54.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kessler has saved 55.31% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hibino has won 49.18% of matches played (W/L 30/ 31), with Kessler winning 63.64% (W/L 49/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 45/ 55). Kessler has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 77% (W/L 17/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 21/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 52% of matches (W/L 13/ 12), where as Kessler has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.42% of matches (W/L 39/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 194.84 while Kessler has played against players with an average rank of 192.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hibino has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kessler has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hibino has converted 46.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kessler has converted 48.42% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
91
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
118
Rank
118
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
55% (372-301)
Career Total W/L
65% (114-62)
49% (18-19)
YTD W/L
62% (23-14)
$1,326,857
Career Prize Money
$281,286
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nao Hibino vs Mccartney Kessler For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hibino VS Kessler
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nao Hibino | Mccartney Kessler |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 49% (18/19) | 62% (23/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (44/48) | 57% (50/38) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (412/412) | 54% (435/377) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 67% (12/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 25% (2/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (2/0) | 100% (5/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 61 | 59 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 103 | 111 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:7 | 1:34:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 171.46 | 162.54 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1806/2692) | 59% (1549/2618) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (1128/1806) | 64% (994/1549) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (406/886) | 48% (514/1069) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (139/301) | 48% (156/322) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1153/2699) | 45% (1152/2550) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Masters W/L | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/3) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (3/6) | 50% (4/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 75% (15/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 49% (18/37) | 61% (22/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 11% (1/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (10/18) | 67% (10/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (17/12) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (17/5) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (20/6) | 33% (21/7) |
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Nao Hibino
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Arantxa Rus
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Suzan Lamens
74%
(
67 of
91)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
86)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Nao Hibino
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Nao Hibino
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Bondar
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Nao Hibino
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
77 of
117)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
0
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
9
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
48 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
116
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mccartney Kessler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Renata Zarazua
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Maya Joint
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Rebecca Marino
53%
(
59 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
2
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
45 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Marino
Player
Mccartney Kessler
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Mccartney Kessler
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Anouk Koevermans
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Mccartney Kessler
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Mccartney Kessler
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
49%
(
18 of
37)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Simona Halep
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
51%
(
31 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
59
Total Points Won
62
|
5-7 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Mccartney Kessler
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hibino Vs Kessler Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hibino are available here and Kessler photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nao Hibino
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mccartney Kessler
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
